T1
BO3
CSGO
2019-10-09
CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Grayhound | vs | Ground Zero | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
anubis
|
68% (13/19) |
|
45% (9/20) | +23pp |
nuke
|
70% (16/23) |
|
48% (16/33) | +22pp |
ancient
|
69% (18/26) |
|
50% (4/8) | +19pp |
mirage
|
65% (15/23) |
|
47% (15/32) | +18pp |
dust2
|
67% (2/3) |
|
56% (18/32) | +11pp |
inferno
|
67% (20/30) |
|
59% (19/32) | +8pp |
overpass
|
— | · | 33% (1/3) | |
vertigo
|
78% (18/23) | · | — |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Grayhound bans
mirage
65% WR
dust2
67% WR
Ground Zero bans
anubis
45% WR
nuke
48% WR
Grayhound pick
ancient
58% — Grayhound favored
Decider
overpass
Decider
vertigo
Ground Zero pick
inferno
47% — Ground Zero favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
anubis
Grayhound
nuke
Grayhound
ancient
Grayhound
mirage
Grayhound
dust2
even
inferno
even
Grayhound on left ·
Ground Zero on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.