CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Grayhound | vs | MOUZ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
vertigo
|
78% (18/23) |
|
53% (23/43) | +25pp |
dust2
|
67% (2/3) |
|
47% (28/60) | +20pp |
mirage
|
65% (15/23) |
|
56% (70/124) | +9pp |
nuke
|
70% (16/23) |
|
61% (66/108) | +9pp |
ancient
|
69% (18/26) |
|
60% (49/81) | +9pp |
inferno
|
67% (20/30) |
|
62% (68/110) | +5pp |
anubis
|
68% (13/19) | · | — | |
overpass
|
— | · | 66% (31/47) |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Grayhound bans
mirage
65% WR
inferno
67% WR
MOUZ bans
dust2
47% WR
vertigo
53% WR
Grayhound pick
nuke
53% — Grayhound favored
Decider
overpass
Decider
anubis
MOUZ pick
ancient
47% — MOUZ favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
vertigo
Grayhound
dust2
Grayhound
mirage
even
nuke
even
ancient
even
inferno
even
Grayhound on left ·
MOUZ on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.