CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Liquid | vs | Grayhound | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
vertigo
|
25% (4/16) |
|
78% (18/23) | -53pp |
nuke
|
46% (38/82) |
|
70% (16/23) | -24pp |
dust2
|
47% (28/60) |
|
67% (2/3) | -20pp |
inferno
|
55% (56/102) |
|
67% (20/30) | -12pp |
mirage
|
56% (49/87) |
|
65% (15/23) | -9pp |
ancient
|
62% (53/86) |
|
69% (18/26) | -7pp |
anubis
|
61% (39/64) |
|
68% (13/19) | -7pp |
overpass
|
53% (19/36) | · | — |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Liquid bans
vertigo
25% WR
nuke
46% WR
Grayhound bans
mirage
65% WR
dust2
67% WR
Liquid pick
ancient
47% — Liquid favored
Decider
overpass
Decider
inferno
55% Grayhound
Grayhound pick
anubis
53% — Grayhound favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
vertigo
Grayhound
nuke
Grayhound
dust2
Grayhound
inferno
Grayhound
mirage
even
ancient
even
anubis
even
Liquid on left ·
Grayhound on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.