Grayhound vs Ninjas in Pyjamas

T2 BO3 CSGO 2019-10-02

Grayhound

0 : 0

Ninjas in Pyjamas

CQ GESUS

Models →

No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	Grayhound	vs	Ninjas in Pyjamas	Edge
vertigo	78% (18/23)		46% (22/48)	+32pp
dust2	67% (2/3)		38% (20/53)	+29pp
inferno	67% (20/30)		42% (22/53)	+25pp
anubis	68% (13/19)		50% (21/42)	+18pp
mirage	65% (15/23)		49% (43/88)	+16pp
ancient	69% (18/26)		55% (66/120)	+14pp
nuke	70% (16/23)		60% (71/118)	+10pp
overpass	—	·	40% (20/50)

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

Grayhound bans

mirage 65% WR

inferno 67% WR

Ninjas in Pyjamas bans

dust2 38% WR

vertigo 46% WR

Grayhound pick

nuke

54% — Grayhound favored

Decider

overpass

Decider

anubis

58% Grayhound

Ninjas in Pyjamas pick

ancient

44% — Ninjas in Pyjamas favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

vertigo

63%

37%

Grayhound

dust2

64%

36%

Grayhound

inferno

61%

39%

Grayhound

anubis

58%

42%

Grayhound

mirage

57%

43%

Grayhound

ancient

56%

44%

Grayhound

nuke

54%

46%

even

Grayhound on left · Ninjas in Pyjamas on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Unverified Match — No Demo Data

Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.

Teams