CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | MIBR | vs | G2 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
38% (3/8) |
|
61% (43/70) | -23pp |
|
|
47% (43/91) |
|
58% (49/84) | -11pp |
|
|
63% (69/109) |
|
54% (28/52) | +9pp |
|
|
47% (14/30) |
|
54% (13/24) | -7pp |
|
|
60% (49/82) |
|
55% (16/29) | +5pp |
|
|
59% (72/122) |
|
62% (44/71) | -3pp |
|
|
66% (63/96) |
|
63% (74/117) | +3pp |
|
|
65% (72/111) |
|
62% (55/89) | +3pp |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
MIBR bans
G2 bans
MIBR pick
51% — MIBR favored
Decider
52% MIBR
Decider
51% G2
G2 pick
49% — G2 favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
G2
G2
even
even
even
even
even
even
MIBR on left ·
G2 on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.