T1
BO3
CSGO
2019-08-28
CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | MIBR | vs | Ninjas in Pyjamas | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
inferno
|
66% (63/96) |
|
42% (22/53) | +24pp |
vertigo
|
60% (49/82) |
|
46% (22/48) | +14pp |
anubis
|
63% (69/109) |
|
50% (21/42) | +13pp |
ancient
|
65% (72/111) |
|
55% (66/120) | +10pp |
overpass
|
47% (14/30) |
|
40% (20/50) | +7pp |
mirage
|
47% (43/91) |
|
49% (43/88) | -2pp |
nuke
|
59% (72/122) |
|
60% (71/118) | -1pp |
dust2
|
38% (3/8) |
|
38% (20/53) | 0pp |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
MIBR bans
dust2
38% WR
mirage
47% WR
Ninjas in Pyjamas bans
overpass
40% WR
inferno
42% WR
MIBR pick
ancient
54% — MIBR favored
Decider
vertigo
57% MIBR
Decider
anubis
56% MIBR
Ninjas in Pyjamas pick
nuke
50% — Ninjas in Pyjamas favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
inferno
MIBR
vertigo
MIBR
anubis
MIBR
ancient
even
overpass
even
mirage
even
nuke
even
dust2
even
MIBR on left ·
Ninjas in Pyjamas on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.