T1 BO3 CSGO 2019-08-25
CQ GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
MIRAGE model →
Map Complexity vs Grayhound Edge
dust2
26% (6/23)
67% (2/3) -41pp
nuke
39% (22/57)
70% (16/23) -31pp
ancient
40% (25/62)
69% (18/26) -29pp
inferno
39% (22/56)
67% (20/30) -28pp
vertigo
62% (26/42)
78% (18/23) -16pp
mirage
50% (4/8)
65% (15/23) -15pp
anubis
57% (39/68)
68% (13/19) -11pp
overpass
63% (33/52) ·
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
MIRAGE model →
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Complexity bans
dust2 26% WR
nuke 39% WR
Grayhound bans
mirage 65% WR
inferno 67% WR
Complexity pick
vertigo
44% — Complexity favored
Decider
overpass
Decider
anubis
54% Grayhound
Grayhound pick
ancient
63% — Grayhound favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
dust2
28%
72%
Grayhound
nuke
36%
64%
Grayhound
ancient
37%
63%
Grayhound
inferno
37%
63%
Grayhound
vertigo
44%
56%
Grayhound
mirage
43%
57%
Grayhound
anubis
46%
54%
even
Complexity on left · Grayhound on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Unverified Match — No Demo Data

Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.