CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | MIBR | vs | AVANGAR | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
63% (69/109) |
|
0% (0/2) | +63pp |
|
|
60% (49/82) |
|
100% (1/1) | -40pp |
|
|
66% (63/96) |
|
29% (2/7) | +37pp |
|
|
65% (72/111) |
|
50% (1/2) | +15pp |
|
|
47% (14/30) |
|
60% (3/5) | -13pp |
|
|
59% (72/122) |
|
50% (2/4) | +9pp |
|
|
47% (43/91) |
|
50% (1/2) | -3pp |
|
|
38% (3/8) | · | — |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Per-Map Win Probability
MIBR
AVANGAR
MIBR
MIBR
AVANGAR
even
even
Veto simulation requires ≥4 maps with data for both teams (min. 3 maps played each).
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.