T1 BO3 CSGO 2019-06-11
CQ GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
MIRAGE model →
Map GamerLegion vs Virtus.pro Edge
nuke
52% (42/81)
100% (2/2) -48pp
vertigo
51% (20/39)
43% (15/35) +8pp
dust2
45% (13/29)
50% (27/54) -5pp
inferno
60% (52/86)
64% (43/67) -4pp
overpass
66% (42/64)
70% (37/53) -4pp
mirage
48% (47/97)
50% (36/72) -2pp
anubis
48% (20/42)
50% (19/38) -2pp
ancient
53% (46/86)
52% (42/81) +1pp
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
MIRAGE model →
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
GamerLegion bans
dust2 45% WR
mirage 48% WR
Virtus.pro bans
vertigo 43% WR
anubis 50% WR
GamerLegion pick
overpass
49% — GamerLegion favored
Decider
nuke
66% Virtus.pro
Decider
ancient
50% GamerLegion
Virtus.pro pick
inferno
52% — Virtus.pro favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
nuke
34%
66%
Virtus.pro
vertigo
54%
46%
even
dust2
47%
53%
even
inferno
48%
52%
even
overpass
49%
51%
even
mirage
49%
51%
even
anubis
49%
51%
even
ancient
50%
50%
even
GamerLegion on left · Virtus.pro on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Unverified Match — No Demo Data

Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.