T1
BO3
CSGO
2019-05-26
CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Sprout | vs | GameAgents | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
inferno
|
60% (39/65) |
|
0% (0/2) | +60pp |
anubis
|
43% (19/44) |
|
75% (3/4) | -32pp |
ancient
|
61% (41/67) |
|
33% (1/3) | +28pp |
mirage
|
55% (24/44) |
|
29% (2/7) | +26pp |
dust2
|
75% (3/4) |
|
50% (1/2) | +25pp |
nuke
|
30% (3/10) |
|
22% (2/9) | +8pp |
overpass
|
54% (25/46) | · | — | |
vertigo
|
53% (29/55) | · | — |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Sprout bans
nuke
30% WR
anubis
43% WR
GameAgents bans
mirage
29% WR
ancient
33% WR
Sprout pick
dust2
60% — Sprout favored
Decider
overpass
Decider
vertigo
GameAgents pick
inferno
0% — GameAgents favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
inferno
Sprout
anubis
GameAgents
ancient
Sprout
mirage
Sprout
dust2
Sprout
nuke
Sprout
Sprout on left ·
GameAgents on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.