CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | W7M | vs | FULL SEND | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
overpass
|
46% (12/26) |
|
0% (0/2) | +46pp |
inferno
|
35% (7/20) |
|
0% (0/2) | +35pp |
nuke
|
47% (21/45) |
|
20% (1/5) | +27pp |
dust2
|
40% (8/20) |
|
60% (3/5) | -20pp |
mirage
|
51% (25/49) |
|
56% (5/9) | -5pp |
ancient
|
47% (32/68) |
|
50% (2/4) | -3pp |
anubis
|
25% (11/44) | · | — | |
vertigo
|
67% (2/3) | · | — |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
W7M bans
dust2
40% WR
ancient
47% WR
FULL SEND bans
nuke
20% WR
mirage
56% WR
W7M pick
vertigo
Decider
anubis
Decider
inferno
100% W7M
FULL SEND pick
overpass
0% — FULL SEND favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
overpass
W7M
inferno
W7M
nuke
W7M
dust2
FULL SEND
mirage
even
ancient
even
W7M on left ·
FULL SEND on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.