CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Cloud9 | vs | Grayhound | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
nuke
|
31% (5/16) |
|
70% (16/23) | -39pp |
ancient
|
53% (35/66) |
|
69% (18/26) | -16pp |
inferno
|
52% (26/50) |
|
67% (20/30) | -15pp |
dust2
|
52% (11/21) |
|
67% (2/3) | -15pp |
vertigo
|
64% (23/36) |
|
78% (18/23) | -14pp |
mirage
|
57% (31/54) |
|
65% (15/23) | -8pp |
anubis
|
62% (30/48) |
|
68% (13/19) | -6pp |
overpass
|
59% (23/39) | · | — |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Cloud9 bans
nuke
31% WR
inferno
52% WR
Grayhound bans
mirage
65% WR
dust2
67% WR
Cloud9 pick
vertigo
45% — Cloud9 favored
Decider
overpass
Decider
anubis
52% Grayhound
Grayhound pick
ancient
57% — Grayhound favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
nuke
Grayhound
ancient
Grayhound
inferno
Grayhound
dust2
Grayhound
vertigo
Grayhound
mirage
even
anubis
even
Cloud9 on left ·
Grayhound on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.