T2
BO3
CSGO
2019-02-06
CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Turma do Pagode | vs | Imperial | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
nuke
|
0% (0/3) |
|
61% (87/142) | -61pp |
inferno
|
0% (0/1) |
|
56% (67/119) | -56pp |
ancient
|
83% (5/6) |
|
31% (5/16) | +52pp |
anubis
|
100% (2/2) |
|
64% (47/74) | +36pp |
overpass
|
67% (2/3) |
|
66% (40/61) | +1pp |
mirage
|
— | · | 66% (89/134) | |
dust2
|
67% (4/6) |
|
67% (58/87) | 0pp |
vertigo
|
— | · | 51% (20/39) |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Turma do Pagode bans
nuke
0% WR
overpass
67% WR
Imperial bans
ancient
31% WR
dust2
67% WR
Turma do Pagode pick
vertigo
Decider
inferno
100% Imperial
Decider
mirage
Imperial pick
anubis
39% — Imperial favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
nuke
Imperial
inferno
Imperial
ancient
Turma do Pagode
anubis
Turma do Pagode
overpass
even
dust2
even
Turma do Pagode on left ·
Imperial on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.