CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | NRG | vs | Bravado | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
anubis
|
62% (33/53) |
|
100% (2/2) | -38pp |
mirage
|
72% (68/95) |
|
100% (1/1) | -28pp |
inferno
|
68% (54/79) |
|
43% (3/7) | +25pp |
overpass
|
57% (13/23) |
|
33% (1/3) | +24pp |
vertigo
|
77% (17/22) |
|
67% (4/6) | +10pp |
ancient
|
58% (37/64) |
|
62% (5/8) | -4pp |
nuke
|
47% (25/53) |
|
50% (3/6) | -3pp |
dust2
|
65% (48/74) | · | — |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
NRG bans
nuke
47% WR
ancient
58% WR
Bravado bans
overpass
33% WR
inferno
43% WR
NRG pick
vertigo
53% — NRG favored
Decider
mirage
58% Bravado
Decider
dust2
Bravado pick
anubis
62% — Bravado favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
anubis
Bravado
mirage
Bravado
inferno
NRG
overpass
NRG
vertigo
even
ancient
even
nuke
even
NRG on left ·
Bravado on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.