CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | LDLC | vs | ENCE | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
vertigo
|
33% (2/6) |
|
67% (33/49) | -34pp |
inferno
|
40% (2/5) |
|
18% (3/17) | +22pp |
nuke
|
40% (4/10) |
|
57% (67/118) | -17pp |
anubis
|
43% (3/7) |
|
57% (50/88) | -14pp |
overpass
|
33% (2/6) |
|
47% (21/45) | -14pp |
dust2
|
50% (1/2) |
|
60% (53/88) | -10pp |
ancient
|
50% (1/2) |
|
54% (73/136) | -4pp |
mirage
|
— | · | 49% (51/104) |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
LDLC bans
vertigo
33% WR
overpass
33% WR
ENCE bans
inferno
18% WR
nuke
57% WR
LDLC pick
anubis
43% — LDLC favored
Decider
ancient
52% ENCE
Decider
mirage
ENCE pick
dust2
55% — ENCE favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
vertigo
ENCE
inferno
LDLC
nuke
ENCE
anubis
ENCE
overpass
ENCE
dust2
ENCE
ancient
even
LDLC on left ·
ENCE on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.