CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Bravado | vs | ENCE | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
mirage
|
100% (1/1) |
|
49% (51/104) | +51pp |
anubis
|
100% (2/2) |
|
57% (50/88) | +43pp |
inferno
|
43% (3/7) |
|
18% (3/17) | +25pp |
overpass
|
33% (1/3) |
|
47% (21/45) | -14pp |
ancient
|
62% (5/8) |
|
54% (73/136) | +8pp |
nuke
|
50% (3/6) |
|
57% (67/118) | -7pp |
dust2
|
— | · | 60% (53/88) | |
vertigo
|
67% (4/6) |
|
67% (33/49) | 0pp |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Bravado bans
overpass
33% WR
nuke
50% WR
ENCE bans
inferno
18% WR
ancient
54% WR
Bravado pick
vertigo
50% — Bravado favored
Decider
mirage
67% Bravado
Decider
dust2
ENCE pick
anubis
36% — ENCE favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
mirage
Bravado
anubis
Bravado
inferno
Bravado
overpass
ENCE
ancient
even
nuke
even
vertigo
even
Bravado on left ·
ENCE on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.