T1
BO3
CSGO
2018-11-24
CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | LDLC | vs | Copenhagen Flames | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
overpass
|
33% (2/6) |
|
100% (4/4) | -67pp |
inferno
|
40% (2/5) |
|
0% (0/4) | +40pp |
ancient
|
50% (1/2) |
|
67% (4/6) | -17pp |
vertigo
|
33% (2/6) |
|
22% (2/9) | +11pp |
nuke
|
40% (4/10) |
|
50% (2/4) | -10pp |
anubis
|
43% (3/7) |
|
50% (1/2) | -7pp |
mirage
|
— | · | — | |
dust2
|
50% (1/2) | · | — |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
LDLC bans
overpass
33% WR
vertigo
33% WR
Copenhagen Flames bans
inferno
0% WR
nuke
50% WR
LDLC pick
ancient
43% — LDLC favored
Decider
anubis
54% Copenhagen Flames
Decider
dust2
Copenhagen Flames pick
mirage
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
overpass
Copenhagen Flames
inferno
LDLC
ancient
Copenhagen Flames
vertigo
LDLC
nuke
Copenhagen Flames
anubis
even
LDLC on left ·
Copenhagen Flames on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.