CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | fnatic | vs | MOUZ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
mirage
|
46% (50/109) |
|
56% (70/124) | -10pp |
overpass
|
56% (40/71) |
|
66% (31/47) | -10pp |
nuke
|
52% (22/42) |
|
61% (66/108) | -9pp |
ancient
|
54% (83/153) |
|
60% (49/81) | -6pp |
dust2
|
48% (31/64) |
|
47% (28/60) | +1pp |
inferno
|
62% (71/114) |
|
62% (68/110) | 0pp |
anubis
|
45% (33/74) | · | — | |
vertigo
|
53% (31/58) |
|
53% (23/43) | 0pp |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
fnatic bans
mirage
46% WR
nuke
52% WR
MOUZ bans
dust2
47% WR
vertigo
53% WR
fnatic pick
inferno
50% — fnatic favored
Decider
anubis
Decider
ancient
53% MOUZ
MOUZ pick
overpass
54% — MOUZ favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
mirage
MOUZ
overpass
even
nuke
even
ancient
even
dust2
even
inferno
even
vertigo
even
fnatic on left ·
MOUZ on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.