T1
BO3
CSGO
2018-09-05
CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Virtus.pro | vs | Ninjas in Pyjamas | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
nuke
|
100% (2/2) |
|
60% (71/118) | +40pp |
overpass
|
70% (37/53) |
|
40% (20/50) | +30pp |
inferno
|
64% (43/67) |
|
42% (22/53) | +22pp |
dust2
|
50% (27/54) |
|
38% (20/53) | +12pp |
ancient
|
52% (42/81) |
|
55% (66/120) | -3pp |
vertigo
|
43% (15/35) |
|
46% (22/48) | -3pp |
mirage
|
50% (36/72) |
|
49% (43/88) | +1pp |
anubis
|
50% (19/38) |
|
50% (21/42) | 0pp |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results.
Edge = team1 WR − team2 WR on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Virtus.pro bans
vertigo
43% WR
mirage
50% WR
Ninjas in Pyjamas bans
dust2
38% WR
overpass
40% WR
Virtus.pro pick
inferno
60% — Virtus.pro favored
Decider
anubis
50% Virtus.pro
Decider
nuke
62% Virtus.pro
Ninjas in Pyjamas pick
ancient
51% — Ninjas in Pyjamas favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
nuke
Virtus.pro
overpass
Virtus.pro
inferno
Virtus.pro
dust2
Virtus.pro
ancient
even
vertigo
even
mirage
even
anubis
even
Virtus.pro on left ·
Ninjas in Pyjamas on right ·
Win prob = historical WR normalised H2H on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.