CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Imperial | vs | UnderDogs | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
dust2
|
67% (58/87) |
|
33% (1/3) | +34pp |
mirage
|
66% (89/134) |
|
33% (1/3) | +33pp |
overpass
|
66% (40/61) |
|
33% (1/3) | +33pp |
inferno
|
56% (67/119) |
|
25% (2/8) | +31pp |
ancient
|
31% (5/16) |
|
50% (3/6) | -19pp |
nuke
|
61% (87/142) |
|
56% (5/9) | +5pp |
anubis
|
64% (47/74) | · | — | |
vertigo
|
51% (20/39) | · | — |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Imperial bans
ancient
31% WR
nuke
61% WR
UnderDogs bans
inferno
25% WR
dust2
33% WR
Imperial pick
overpass
67% — Imperial favored
Decider
vertigo
Decider
anubis
UnderDogs pick
mirage
33% — UnderDogs favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
dust2
Imperial
mirage
Imperial
overpass
Imperial
inferno
Imperial
ancient
UnderDogs
nuke
even
Imperial on left ·
UnderDogs on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.