CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | fish123 | vs | Endpoint | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
nuke
|
69% (11/16) |
|
22% (2/9) | +47pp |
anubis
|
80% (4/5) |
|
48% (31/65) | +32pp |
dust2
|
78% (7/9) |
|
50% (13/26) | +28pp |
overpass
|
40% (2/5) |
|
67% (14/21) | -27pp |
ancient
|
64% (14/22) |
|
47% (47/99) | +17pp |
mirage
|
50% (4/8) |
|
58% (61/106) | -8pp |
inferno
|
50% (3/6) |
|
57% (46/81) | -7pp |
vertigo
|
— | · | 50% (29/58) |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
fish123 bans
overpass
40% WR
mirage
50% WR
Endpoint bans
nuke
22% WR
ancient
47% WR
fish123 pick
anubis
62% — fish123 favored
Decider
dust2
61% fish123
Decider
vertigo
Endpoint pick
inferno
53% — Endpoint favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
nuke
fish123
anubis
fish123
dust2
fish123
overpass
Endpoint
ancient
fish123
mirage
even
inferno
even
fish123 on left ·
Endpoint on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.