T2
BO3
CSGO
2018-03-29
CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Ninjas in Pyjamas | vs | Virtus.pro | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
nuke
|
60% (71/118) |
|
100% (2/2) | -40pp |
overpass
|
40% (20/50) |
|
70% (37/53) | -30pp |
inferno
|
42% (22/53) |
|
64% (43/67) | -22pp |
dust2
|
38% (20/53) |
|
50% (27/54) | -12pp |
ancient
|
55% (66/120) |
|
52% (42/81) | +3pp |
vertigo
|
46% (22/48) |
|
43% (15/35) | +3pp |
mirage
|
49% (43/88) |
|
50% (36/72) | -1pp |
anubis
|
50% (21/42) |
|
50% (19/38) | 0pp |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results.
Edge = team1 WR − team2 WR on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Ninjas in Pyjamas bans
dust2
38% WR
overpass
40% WR
Virtus.pro bans
vertigo
43% WR
mirage
50% WR
Ninjas in Pyjamas pick
ancient
51% — Ninjas in Pyjamas favored
Decider
anubis
50% Ninjas in Pyjamas
Decider
nuke
62% Virtus.pro
Virtus.pro pick
inferno
60% — Virtus.pro favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
nuke
Virtus.pro
overpass
Virtus.pro
inferno
Virtus.pro
dust2
Virtus.pro
ancient
even
vertigo
even
mirage
even
anubis
even
Ninjas in Pyjamas on left ·
Virtus.pro on right ·
Win prob = historical WR normalised H2H on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.