CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | SENSEI | vs | Imperial | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
vertigo
|
100% (1/1) |
|
51% (20/39) | +49pp |
ancient
|
75% (3/4) |
|
31% (5/16) | +44pp |
inferno
|
14% (1/7) |
|
56% (67/119) | -42pp |
anubis
|
33% (1/3) |
|
64% (47/74) | -31pp |
mirage
|
40% (2/5) |
|
66% (89/134) | -26pp |
dust2
|
50% (1/2) |
|
67% (58/87) | -17pp |
nuke
|
— | · | 61% (87/142) | |
overpass
|
— | · | 66% (40/61) |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
SENSEI bans
inferno
14% WR
anubis
33% WR
Imperial bans
ancient
31% WR
mirage
66% WR
SENSEI pick
overpass
Decider
dust2
57% Imperial
Decider
nuke
Imperial pick
vertigo
34% — Imperial favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
vertigo
SENSEI
ancient
SENSEI
inferno
Imperial
anubis
Imperial
mirage
Imperial
dust2
Imperial
SENSEI on left ·
Imperial on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.