T1 BO3 CSGO 2016-10-21
CQ GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
MIRAGE model →
Map iNation vs ALTERNATE aTTaX Edge
overpass
20% (1/5)
51% (37/72) -31pp
anubis
29% (2/7)
57% (71/125) -28pp
ancient
22% (2/9)
42% (47/112) -20pp
inferno
43% (6/14)
51% (50/98) -8pp
dust2
60% (3/5)
56% (15/27) +4pp
mirage
38% (3/8)
35% (20/57) +3pp
nuke
33% (2/6)
36% (4/11) -3pp
vertigo
· 53% (31/58)
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
MIRAGE model →
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
iNation bans
overpass 20% WR
ancient 22% WR
ALTERNATE aTTaX bans
mirage 35% WR
nuke 36% WR
iNation pick
dust2
52% — iNation favored
Decider
vertigo
Decider
inferno
54% ALTERNATE aTTaX
ALTERNATE aTTaX pick
anubis
66% — ALTERNATE aTTaX favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
overpass
28%
72%
ALTERNATE aTTaX
anubis
34%
66%
ALTERNATE aTTaX
ancient
34%
66%
ALTERNATE aTTaX
inferno
46%
54%
even
dust2
52%
48%
even
mirage
52%
48%
even
nuke
48%
52%
even
iNation on left · ALTERNATE aTTaX on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Unverified Match — No Demo Data

Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.