CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Cloud9 | vs | TNT | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
overpass
|
59% (23/39) |
|
0% (0/1) | +59pp |
inferno
|
52% (26/50) |
|
100% (2/2) | -48pp |
nuke
|
31% (5/16) |
|
67% (6/9) | -36pp |
dust2
|
52% (11/21) |
|
17% (1/6) | +35pp |
ancient
|
53% (35/66) |
|
80% (4/5) | -27pp |
mirage
|
57% (31/54) |
|
67% (4/6) | -10pp |
anubis
|
62% (30/48) |
|
67% (4/6) | -5pp |
vertigo
|
64% (23/36) | · | — |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Cloud9 bans
nuke
31% WR
ancient
53% WR
TNT bans
dust2
17% WR
mirage
67% WR
Cloud9 pick
anubis
48% — Cloud9 favored
Decider
vertigo
Decider
inferno
66% TNT
TNT pick
overpass
0% — TNT favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
overpass
Cloud9
inferno
TNT
nuke
TNT
dust2
Cloud9
ancient
TNT
mirage
even
anubis
even
Cloud9 on left ·
TNT on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.