CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | ENCE | vs | Arcade | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
dust2
|
60% (53/88) |
|
12% (1/8) | +48pp |
ancient
|
54% (73/136) |
|
17% (1/6) | +37pp |
vertigo
|
67% (33/49) |
|
100% (1/1) | -33pp |
anubis
|
57% (50/88) |
|
25% (2/8) | +32pp |
overpass
|
47% (21/45) |
|
30% (3/10) | +17pp |
inferno
|
18% (3/17) |
|
33% (3/9) | -15pp |
mirage
|
49% (51/104) |
|
50% (7/14) | -1pp |
nuke
|
57% (67/118) |
|
58% (11/19) | -1pp |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
ENCE bans
inferno
18% WR
overpass
47% WR
Arcade bans
dust2
12% WR
ancient
17% WR
ENCE pick
nuke
50% — ENCE favored
Decider
vertigo
60% Arcade
Decider
anubis
70% ENCE
Arcade pick
mirage
51% — Arcade favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
dust2
ENCE
ancient
ENCE
vertigo
Arcade
anubis
ENCE
overpass
ENCE
inferno
Arcade
mirage
even
nuke
even
ENCE on left ·
Arcade on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.